Alan Rubin's response to
LA Times: Foul state of affairs found in feedlots

I had to laugh when I read Alan Rubin's response to this LA Times article. Especially when he said,
"I wish that the Water Environment Federation's Government Affairs Committee had the benefit of this article when it
submitted its comments on the Farm Bill which will be coming up in the next Congress." Rubin and the WEF used that
argument in 1997. See the
webpage on Rubin
Jim Bynum

"The Rubins" <[email protected]>
To: "Edo McGowan" <[email protected]>
Subject: Fw: LA Times: Foul state of affairs found in feedlots
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:48:22 -0500

----- Original Message -----
From: The Rubins
To: Cathy Fehrenbacher ; Steve Stockton ; Jon Coffin ; Diane Gilbert ; Chris Westhoff ; James Slaughter ; Chris Seney ;
Brian Lochrie ; Geoffrey Swett ; Geoffrey Swett ; Jeff Meberg ; Jeff Meberg ; [email protected] ; Jim Smith
; [email protected] ; Bastian.Robe[email protected] ; [email protected] ; Stevens.rick@epa.
gov ; Kester, Greg ; Lori A. Stone ; Peter Machno ; Steve Frank ; Ned Beecher ; Chris Hornback ; Adam Krantz ; Tim
Williams ; Gene Demichele ; Sam Hadeed ; Rhonda Bowen ; Todd Williams ; Baroldi, Layne ; Moore, Michael ; daughton.
[email protected] ; Amit Pramanik ; Glenn Reinhardt ; Alan Barry Hais ; Linda Kelly ; Linda.
[email protected] ; Joseph G. Cleary ; Mary E. Buzby, Ph.D. ; Rob Schweinfurth ; Bryce Payne, Ph.D.
Cc: Ellen Z. Harrison ; Nancy Stoner ; Melanie Shepherdson ; Edo McGowan ; Rufus Chaney ; Steve Wing ; maureen.
[email protected] ; M Reilly
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 1:07 PM
Subject: Fw: LA Times: Foul state of affairs found in feedlots


An absolutely devasting article on CAFO animal manures!!!  Again strongly suggests indirectly that in the biosolids biz,
superb regulations and a wealth of scientific studies have made the management of biosolids an absolutely safe
practice.  Also makes you wonder the motives of those that criticize the safety of biosolids recycling without expressing
their concern for CAFO animal manures.  Notice that the issues of metals, antibiotics, odors, water pollution, etc are
documented for CAFO manures in an unregulated world, the same issues that are brought up by biosolids critics for
biosolids in a totally regulated world.

I wish that the Water Environment Federation's Government Affairs Committee had the benefit of this article when it
submitted its comments on the Farm Bill which will be coming up in the next Congress.

This will give me a Great Thanksgiving.  The same to you and your families.



----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;
[email protected] ; ; [email protected] ; [email protected]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 11:14 AM
Subject: LA Times: Foul state of affairs found in feedlots


Foul state of affairs found in feedlots
Factory farms are harmful to the public and the environment, researchers report.
By Marla Cone
Times Staff Writer

November 17, 2006

Growing so large that they are now called factory farms, livestock feedlots are poorly regulated, pose health and
ecological dangers and are responsible for deteriorating quality of life in America's and Europe's farm regions,
according to a series of scientific studies published this week.

Feedlots are contaminating water supplies with pathogens and chemicals, and polluting the air with foul-smelling
compounds that can cause respiratory problems, but the health of their neighbors goes largely unmonitored, the reports

The international teams of environmental scientists also warned that the livestock operations were contributing to the
rise of antibiotic-resistant germs, and that the proximity of poultry to hogs could hasten the spread of avian flu to

Feedlots are operations in which hundreds — often thousands — of cattle, hogs or poultry are confined, often in very
close quarters. About 15,500 medium to large livestock feedlots operate in the United States in what is an approximately
$80-billion-a-year industry.

Although the reports focused largely on Iowa and North Carolina hog and poultry operations, California has more than
2,000 facilities with at least 300 livestock animals each, half of them with more than 1,000, according to a 2002 estimate
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Dairies, most of them in the San Joaquin Valley, dominate the industry in

Led by Peter Thorne, director of the University of Iowa's Environmental Health Sciences Research Center, the
researchers outlined the need for more stringent regulations and surveillance of water and air near feedlots.

"There was general agreement among all [the scientists] that the industrialization of livestock production over the past
three decades has not been accompanied by commensurate modernization of regulations to protect the health of the
public or natural, public-trust resources, particularly in the U.S.," wrote Thorne, a professor of toxicology and
environmental engineering.

The findings were from a consensus of experts from the United States, Canada and northern Europe who convened in
Iowa two years ago for a workshop funded by the federal government to address environmental and health issues
related to large livestock operations. Six reports, written by three dozen scientists mostly from the American Midwest and
Scandinavia, were published this week in the online version of the scientific journal Environmental Health Perspectives.

Among their recommendations are limits on the population density of animals and mandatory extensive environmental
reviews for new feedlots. They also recommended a ban on the use of antibiotics to promote animal growth, and that the
drugs be available to farmers only through prescriptions.

In a new area of concern, the scientists said they were worried about the danger of a flu pandemic spread by feedlots
with both hogs and poultry, and recommended new regulations to set minimum distances between the two.

Farm industry representatives said they were not familiar with the new reports and could not address specific findings or
recommendations. But they said that many environmental improvements had already been made, and that some experts
at universities had said the health risks were minor.

"The livestock industry has been under very intense scrutiny over the past 10 years, and as a result, has gone to great
lengths and very high expense to try to improve their environmental record, across the board," said Don Parrish, the
American Farm Bureau Federation's senior director of regulatory relations.

"We've definitely improved our game over the past 10 years," Parrish said, and most livestock owners "are being very
sensitive to their neighbors and doing the best job they can."

Many of the risks come from the sheer volume of manure. Livestock excrete 13 times more waste than humans — 133
million tons per year in the United States — and some individual feedlots produce as much waste as entire cities.

The American Farm Bureau Federation maintains that almost every state regulates the amount of manure applied to the
land to protect water supplies.

But the new reports criticized the current techniques.

"Generally accepted livestock waste management practices do not adequately or effectively protect water resources
from contamination with excessive nutrients, microbial pathogens and pharmaceuticals present in the waste," the
scientists reported.

The number of large livestock operations has surged in the last two decades, and farms with more than 500 hogs now
account for three-quarters of the U.S. inventory. In Iowa, the average number of hogs per farm increased from 250 to
1,430 between 1980 and 2000.

California has more than 2,000 dairies, mostly in Tulare and Merced counties, and many have thousands of cows each.
But the health risks to the dairy workers and their neighbors have gone unstudied, said Frank Mitloehner, director of the
UC Davis Agricultural Air Emissions Center, who was not involved in the new reports.

UC Davis is launching a five-year study, led by Mitloehner, at dairies in Tulare and Merced counties, to examine the
threat from air pollutants. Among the air pollutants from feedlots are ammonia; fine particles of manure, feed, soil and
bacteria that can lodge in lungs; and endotoxin, which can inflame respiratory tissues and trigger asthma, bronchitis and

"There is potential for health effects, but in order to find out the intensity of them, we need to conduct these studies,"
Mitloehner said.

One of the new reports says a serious impact of feedlots "is their disruption of quality of life for neighboring residents,"
mostly in low-income and nonwhite communities.

"More than an unpleasant odor, the smell can have dramatic consequences for rural communities whose lives are
rooted in enjoying the outdoors," says the report, compiled by researchers in Iowa, Illinois and North Carolina. "The
highly cherished values of freedom and independence associated with life oriented toward the outdoors gives way to
feelings of violation and infringement…. Homes become a barrier against the outdoors that must be escaped."

In water supplies, the biggest problems are nitrates and fecal bacteria, although experts have also recently discovered
animal antibiotics and other drugs in waterways. The scientists recommended that private wells, which largely are
unregulated, be monitored carefully near the factory farms.

The EPA was sued in 1989 by an environmental group, the Natural Resources Defense Council, for failing to regulate
feedlots under the Clean Water Act. Fewer than 40% have permits for discharging pollutants because of EPA
exemptions and lax federal and state enforcement, according to a 2003 report by what was then the General Accounting

In June, the Bush administration proposed new regulations that would require feedlots to develop plans for controlling
manure and obtain Clean Water Act permits.

[email protected]